Anonymous Comments Will Be Removed

Anonymous posts can be confusing and hard to follow with several users posting anonymously in the same thread. Please create a User Name/ID when adding to our comments section.

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Powder Mountain Rezone Tabled Again!

The Powder Mountain rezone petition was tabled again by the Ogden Valley Planning Commission at Tuesday's meeting. It was agreed that the rezone request will be heard on November 27, 2007, at 4:30PM.

Jamie Lythgoe, an OVPC Commissioner, belatedly provided disclosure of her family (Cobabe) holdings that include one-half of one percent of Western America Holding, the company requesting the rezone now before the OVPC, and 200+ acres of land adjacent to the rezone area. It is important to note that none of this family ownership information disclosed by Ms. Lythgoe Tuesday night was forthcoming until a newspaper article broke the story last week.

Representing the VCRD, I personally talked to Ms. Lythgoe in early September about the issue of Conflict of Interest at Powder Mountain. She told me that Ms. Hurtado, deputy County attorney, stated there was no conflict of interest with her being in the Real Estate business in the area. During this conversation, Ms. Lythgoe never disclosed the current holdings of the Cobabe family she later detailed at yesterday's OVPC meeting.

If there is any question whether the Cobabe holdings would appreciate in value with the rezone of almost 8,000 acres for a "World Class Resort" adjacent to their property, one needs only to look at what is happening all across Ogden Valley to property value assessments and taxes because of new adjacent developments.

The VCRD membership feels that the conflict of interest rule clearly applies on this issue. The Cobabe family owns one-half of one percent of the development area (almost 8000 acres) that will be impacted by the rezone request, and an additional 200+ acres adjacent to the rezone area.

Most of the OVPC Commissioners Tuesday appeared to have no problem with the conflict of interest issue for Ms. Lythgoe despite the fact that her family's holdings clearly fit the conflict of interest criteria as defined in the Planning Commission Procedures.

The Planning Commission Procedures, (Regarding Conflict of Interest) Part A reads:

"A Planning Commissioner to whom some private benefits may come as the result of a Planning Commission action should not be a participant in the action." Part 1 states "The Private benefit may be direct or indirect, create a material, personal gain or provide a distinct advantage to relations or to friends or to groups and associations which hold some of share of a person's loyalty."

The Commission Chairman, Louis Cooper and the Asst. County Attorney Allred were quoted in the Standard Examiner last week that they were under the impression that the Cobabe family had sold all of their interests at Powder Mountain. In addition, Monette Hurtado this morning is quoted regarding Ms. Lythgoe's disclosure as saying "As to her specific ownership, I don't know the details," and "She did disclose that her family sold all their land."

In summary, what we have here is a deputy County Attorney that admits not knowing all the details about Ms. Lythgoe's family ownership but is quoted as the source for the "No conflict of Interest" legal opinion by the OVPC Chairman Louis Cooper.

It is obvious and disappointing that the OVPC Commissioners are dominated by the deputy County attorney and are reluctant to challenge her opinion even when the facts regarding a conflict of interest hits them right between the eyes. We would remind the Commissioners that her job is legal advice for the County and they should not subordinate their independent judgment on a sensitive issue such as conflict of interest involving a fellow Commissioner when it could further undermine the public trust in government.

Our members question the reason that Ms. Lythgoe doggedly will not recuse herself on this Powder Mountain issue unless she has some long range stake in the outcome. As the OVPC Chairman pointed out, there are six other commissioners to address this rezone. The OVPC members have recused themselves in the recent past numerous times on conflict issues less egregious than the direct Cobabe family ownership of a property rezone now before the OVPC.

Your VCRD Staff

5 comments:

Minor Machman said...

What we have here is a culture clash. I have seen it in the Huntsville Secondary Water Board Articles of Incorporation & Bylaws, Utah State Legislature rules, and even at the Town Council level on occasion. Those who have been exposed to outside Utah corporate, institutional, military and political ethics training learn an "appartent COI" is as bad as a direct COI. We learned the proper legal thing to do is to recuse oneself and leave the room refusing to have anything to do with discussion or voting on the issue.
But Utahans and this culture has the mysterious and preplexing notion that one need only speak up to disclose a COI. The others present do the "drinking duck" (as in nod up and down in agreement)acknowledging the COI and all is forgiven. No recusals or exist from the discussion or voting is apparently required. This unique and less than ethical behavior has been explained to me as; because so many people are related in one manner or another, if they did the American Conflict of Interest thing there would be no one left to vote on any issue. Possibly true prior to the invasion by gentiles. Our Valley is now more non LDS than LDS for the first time in post 1850 history. Maybe it is time for the American version of ethics reform? What do the OVPC members have to say about that?

Anonymous said...

I am amazed that Ms. Lythgoe does not recuse herself. It is so simple and obvious; her family has ownership in the propsed development and she has ownership in rental units next to the proposed development and both of these will benefit greatly if/when Powder Mtn is developed. Furthermore, while she does not have direct ownership in either the 1/2 of 1 percent of the development or the 220 acres adjacent can and will she ensure the public that she is not a named beneficiary for these properties in any legal documents such as wills or trusts.

Ms Lythgoe just do the sensible and common sense action; recuse yourself from this issue.

Ron Gleason

Anonymous said...

I'm a simple man with simple values but this issue stinks to high heaven. So on one hand our county officials tell us to suck it up and pay outrageous property tax increases that are based on sales and percieved values of the properties around us. Yet in the case of Ms. Lythgoe the increase in value of her holdings will not be effected by the properties around here? Which is it?? I sometimes wonder if I made a wise decision when I gave up 6 figure salary offers back east to return and raise my family in what I thought was a just and honest community. Maybe the first clue to me should have been the finally voided sale of that large plot of land to Rulon Jones. I knew then that something was wrong because there was no way I could move back to the valley and pick up that much acreage for such a tiny sum. I am really dissapointed and disturbed by the repeated failings I see of our county officials as the conduct business. As a retired soldier who understands the words service and ethics I think our officials need to take a moment and reflect on what it means to hold a position of public trust.

Anonymous said...

This was a comment posted on 10/25, on 10/28 the same person did a complete flip flop on his position, is this guy a Lemming?

Ms Lythgoe just do the sensible and common sense action; recuse yourself from this issue.

Ron Gleason

Jamie Lythgoe said...

Please address concerns over these planning issues to

Commission Office
Attention: Sherri Sillito,
Planning department
2380 Washington Blvd.
Ogden, UT 84401

Sherri Sillito 801-399-8791

ssillito@co.weber.ut.us


Jamie Lythgoe