Anonymous Comments Will Be Removed

Anonymous posts can be confusing and hard to follow with several users posting anonymously in the same thread. Please create a User Name/ID when adding to our comments section.

Friday, November 07, 2008

Utah high court strikes down law limiting citizen initiative powers

Article from Salt Lake Tribune November 7, 2008 by Cathy McKitrick

The Utah Supreme Court on Friday struck down a new law limiting citizen-initiative powers.

"This direct prohibition of the subject of an initiative brought otherwise within the conditions, manner and time restrictions imposed by law is beyond the power of the Legislature to enact," wrote Justice Michael Wilkins in voiding SB53.

The unanimous opinion noted that the Utah Constitution gives both the Legislature and the people equivalent power to enact or change legislation.

SB53, sponsored by Sen. Brent Goodfellow, D-West Valley City, sailed through this year's general legislative session and was signed by the governor in March. It took effect in early May.

As worded, it barred voters from launching initiatives regarding land-use ordinances. It also prohibited them from putting the implementation of a land-use ordinance to a public vote.

The appellate case of Sevier Power Co. v. Hansen was the first to test the fledgling statute.

Sharlene Hansen and other Sevier County residents joined a grass-roots effort seeking a ballot measure to see if voters approved of plans to build a coal-fired power plant in Sigurd.

They gathered enough signatures to get a place on November ballot. But 6th District Judge Wallace Lee, citing SB53, removed it.

Last week, Utah's high court ordered the measure back on the ballot - and, on Friday, issued the decision tossing out SB53.

"When we started out in February 2008, we believed we were doing a countywide right to vote," said Elaine Bonavita, a Richfield resident who helped spearhead the initiative effort. "But because of SB53, we now can say we played a part in restoring the right to vote to all Utahns."

In an April letter to Sevier County Attorney Dale Eyre, Assistant Attorney General Thom Roberts advised that courts could overturn SB53 because it infringed on a basic constitutional right.

4 comments:

The Viking said...

How about that? It seems that all that bull that we heard from our local leaders and the Lt. Governor was wrong. Something could be done about stupid legislation that infringed on basic citizen's rights.

They just didn't want to be bothered. It is apparent now, that the citizens of Utah and Weber County have a powerful tool to use when necessary.

The Squirt said...

Read that last paragraph! Sound familiar to HB466 and remember all the tap dancing done by our leadership in the County and State saying they were helpless. Well, they got a little help!

I hope they are smart enough to follow the lead of the Utah Supreme Court.

Sooth-sayer said...

Very interesting conversation with Powderville potential financier's banker recently.

Let's just say that they were told (in my own opinion), in no uncertain terms, that the Powderville development and the under penning legislation (HB 466)which enabled it, will be overturned at the State Supreme Court level.

To advise future investors without representing the very high odds that the whole undertaking will have the courts pull the rug from underneath it, would be ultimately resented by these private investors. And long term effects would be a loss of these investor's confidence and therefore clientele. Not a good situation for anyone.

Anonymous said...

Too bad the ring leader is crazy.